Skip to main content

A Suitable Boy and polarisation under the pretext of protection

So SRK can pee in a church in DDLJ. Nobody gets offended.

Minor girl can be raped in a temple. Nobody gets offended.

Come to think of it - Hrithik Roshan was romancing near Haji Ali in Fiza, and nobody got offended.

But Hindu woman kissing a Muslim boy in a temple on-screen. THAT'S offensive! Never mind the scores of college kids who make out in empty temples anyway. Reality does not matter. If someone says it is offensive on a whim, it is! You see - it is very easy to be outraged in India for all sorts of illogical reasons. You can be outraged over someone eating beef, you can be outraged over someone kissing someone else, you can be outraged over someone writing a book, you can be outraged over a great many things. Unfortunately, when it comes to the real test where you expect outrage, that is where this country remains mute, like when a rape-victim is burnt alive in police custody on her way to testify in court. THAT can be forgotten, in fact, it's hardly noticed, if at all. But I bet 'A Suitable Boy' and how it offended some people is going to be discussed for months, vehemently at that.

Gone are the days when Bombay movie got rave reviews. Today's India has become super intolerant and it's become fashionable to associate every inter-religous romantic interaction with 'love-jihad'. It was so sad to see the reaction to Tanishq Ekatvam ad, and watch it being withdrawn. The morons who said Tanishq was advocating 'love-jihad' because Hindu woman was married into a Muslim family, are now beating their chests that a Hindu woman kissed a Muslim man in A Suitable Boy. I seriously don't know whether to laugh or to cry considering the reason for being offended.

Who are we kidding about the direction in which this is going? Are we blind or we don't want to see? This kind of forced separation of religions is going to have disastrous results in terms of sustaining peace and harmony. Heaven knows - this country has seen enough violence and riots! This is against everything India stands for as a country and our pride in its religious freedom.

Kangana Ranaut has been awarded Padma Shri, someone who supports extremist views against Muslims and recommended shooting mullahs in public. But Deepika Padukone was boycotted for showing her solidarity with abused students subjected to violence in JNU. This government's marketing strategy is executed beyond excellence in discrediting everything and everyone who even remotely criticizes it. They've done a great job of brainwashing everyone that such information should not be believed and anyone voicing such an opinion has a malicious intent behind it. Even more disturbingly, they have been subtly provoking people to bully or harm anyone who is vocal about alternate views. Remember Gauri Lankesh

Of course, everyone who expresses dissent has nothing to do all day but deliberately make stuff out of thin air without any rationale or fact to keep undermining the government because they are so 'anti-patriotic', right? So they say! Or is it the other way: Everyone who bullies dissenters has no basis in fact or rationale to have fanatic faith in the government and needs no ethical stand to abuse and bully genuine critics?

Apparently, asking Mullahs to be shot is not offensive. But kissing in a temple is. So why don't we bulldoze the plethora of erotic sculptures present all over ancient Hindu temples and be done with it? Why did a Hindu God Lord Venkateswara marry a Muslim then?

And kindly do not make stupid arguments! I am of course against forced conversions. But isn't insulting to think that full-grown adult women are not capable of making religious choices for themselves? Are we 'protecting' them by restricting their freedom in the same way Khaps wanted to 'protect' women by banning cell phones?

As a Hindu, I hate the way Hinduism is being re-defined by certain extremist groups. I hate that my religion, which has one of the most liberal and open-minded universal views, is being hijacked to represent idiotic interpretations proposed by a chosen few who barely comprehend it. I hate that my patriotism to my country is being redefined to reverence for one government. I hate the joke that my country is being made into. This has to stop.

Dear extremists, before you say it let me answer it:

NO - You can shut the fuck up about asking me to leave India, go to Pakistan, call me anti-nationalist, anti-patriotic, believer of 'paid media', pimp to 'Western media', convert to Islam, denounce Hinduism, and any other illogical retort you always come up with when you have nothing logical for defense. I don't give a damn about your bullying. This is MY country and I have every right to express what I feel and I am not going ANYWHERE. Chill folks! I am not the one who is being clouded. Maybe consider for once the possibility that you are the one blinded and get out of your bubble before it's too late. Hopefully, we don't have to repeat history to remember the lessons it teaches us.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Related posts:

1. Yo, What's Your Beef: Sharing heartranjan's post - link

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aahista chal zindagi - A new year treat

As a new year treat, I am sharing this beautiful poem written by an anonymous poet. I actually came across it on Whatsapp during last new year when it was being circulated. The forward says it's written by Gulzar but I couldn't trace any source to confirm this, and any original source to link this to, so I am just pasting it here - It doesn't matter who wrote it. It is as beautiful as it is touching: Aahista chal zindagi, abhi kai karz chukana baaki hai Kuch dard mitana baaki hai, kuch farz nibhana baaki hai Raftaar mein tere chalne se kuchh rooth gaye, kuch chhoot gaye Roothon ko manana baaki hai, roton ko hasana baki hai Kuch hasraatein abhi adhuri hain, kuch kaam bhi aur zaruri hai Kuch rishte ban kar toot gaye, kuch judte-judte chhoot gaye Un toote-chhoote rishton ke zakhmon ko mitana baki hai Tu aage chal main aata hoon, kya chhod tujhe ji paunga? In saanson par haqq hai jinka, unko samjhaana baaki hai Aahista chal zindagi, abhi kai karz chukana baki hai So how

Lechindi... nidra lechindi mahila lokam...

Lechindi.. nidra lechindi mahila lokam... These lines belong to one of the most popular songs of the old Telugu cinema, which are from the film 'Gundamma Katha' ( link ). The song is meant to be a spoof on the feminist movement which started in India before independence, basically about what the then generation perceived to be "role-reversal" ( which it is not - it is simply everyone having the freedom to define one's own 'role' ). I am currently watching the film and took a break to do this post. It would be utterly unfair for me to judge a movie of that time by current values/standards so I'm refraining myself. But I do want to write about how the people of that time (wrongly) understood what feminism and women empowerment were about. Admittedly, I'm not being very harsh as this song is a very beloved one in the Telugu heartland which comes from a very old time. It can be translated as something like this (I'm keeping only relevant parts

Guide to marital bliss - Find out what feminists fight against!!

If you've never really understood the evils of patriarchy ( link ), believing that feminists blow things out of proportion, may be you should open your eyes to this. Let me show you what's wrong. Below are the guidelines for women translated from a Telugu book on marital bliss which was being distributed at a wedding last week . We need to take this seriously - because our rituals are not evolving with our mindsets. The book advocates this code of conduct for today's women  to restore values in today's society of  Kalyug . We must not let anyone defend this sort of inhuman abuse under the name of Indian/Hindu culture/values . I'm giving scanned images of some of the guidelines along with the English translation of these guidelines. Adding my response to some of the guidelines  in red . 1. Every task performed by a wife must be upon the husband's order .  Are we talking about a wife or a slave here ? Or worse, the book doesn't see any need to